Accreditation

Academic quality is reviewed through transparent standards, external peers, and public evidence.

Pannonian University maintains a quality cycle for curriculum approval, faculty review, student feedback, research ethics, and public reporting.

University information

Pannonian University maintains a quality cycle for curriculum approval, faculty review, student feedback, research ethics, and public reporting.

Review rhythmAnnual program monitoring
External inputPeer and partner panels
Student voiceModule feedback every term

Details

How this works at PU.

Accreditation

Quality framework

Each program is reviewed against learning outcomes, assessment evidence, staff capacity, student progression, graduate signals, and partner relevance. Reviews are chaired by the Quality Assurance Council and include student representatives.

Accreditation

Program approval

New degrees pass through faculty board review, academic senate approval, resource checks, assessment mapping, and a public course specification before recruitment begins.

Accreditation

External examiners

Selected modules and capstones are sampled by external academic peers who review standards, marking consistency, and the relationship between coursework and published learning outcomes.

Operational signals

Useful reference points.

Accreditation

Academic Senate

Approves degree structures and monitors academic regulations.

Accreditation

Quality Assurance Council

Runs program review, student feedback cycles, and external examiner reporting.

Accreditation

Ethics Review Desk

Reviews fieldwork, interviews, data protection, and research consent.