University information
Accreditation
Academic quality is reviewed through transparent standards, external peers, and public evidence.
Pannonian University maintains a quality cycle for curriculum approval, faculty review, student feedback, research ethics, and public reporting.
Details
How this works at PU.
Quality framework
Each program is reviewed against learning outcomes, assessment evidence, staff capacity, student progression, graduate signals, and partner relevance. Reviews are chaired by the Quality Assurance Council and include student representatives.
Program approval
New degrees pass through faculty board review, academic senate approval, resource checks, assessment mapping, and a public course specification before recruitment begins.
External examiners
Selected modules and capstones are sampled by external academic peers who review standards, marking consistency, and the relationship between coursework and published learning outcomes.
Operational signals
Useful reference points.
Academic Senate
Approves degree structures and monitors academic regulations.
Quality Assurance Council
Runs program review, student feedback cycles, and external examiner reporting.
Ethics Review Desk
Reviews fieldwork, interviews, data protection, and research consent.